Know exactly how your CV scores against the job — before you apply.
Your CV and one specific job description, matched line by line. You get a predicted score out of 100, a transparent breakdown of where every point came from, a list of what's missing, and a rewritten version of your CV content built strictly from the experience you already have. It is the difference between hoping your CV gets through and knowing whether it will.
It doesn't matter how good you are if the system can't see it.
Most employers now run applications through an Applicant Tracking System before a human reads them. The system parses your CV, extracts your skills, titles and dates, and ranks you against the job description. Recruiters then search that ranked list using the exact words from the job advert. If your CV describes the right experience in the wrong language, it ranks below weaker candidates who happened to use the right terms.
The frustrating part is that most of these gaps are not gaps in experience. They are gaps in wording, structure and emphasis. The report finds every one of those and tells you which are fixable today, which need a number you can go and get, and which are real gaps you shouldn't paper over.
Same experience, wrong words
- The job says "SME"≠Your CV says "SMB"
- The job asks for "customer acquisition"≠Your CV calls it "growth"
- The tool they list by name≠One you've used for years but never wrote down
Each of these costs you rank. Each of them is fixable in an afternoon.
A full scorecard, not a guess.
Every score comes with the reasoning and the arithmetic shown, so you know where you stand and exactly what to do about it.
A predicted ATS match score and tier
So you know where you stand: exceptional, strong, moderate, weak, or knocked out.
A scorecard across seven weighted categories
Keyword match, job title alignment, experience depth, credentials, responsibilities and achievements, formatting and parsability, and soft skills — with the reasoning and the arithmetic shown for every score.
A ranked, colour-coded keyword map
The 15 to 25 terms an ATS or recruiter is most likely to search for in that role, marked as matched, partially matched or absent in your CV.
A knockout check
Location, work authorisation and mandatory credentials, because no amount of rewriting fixes a hard filter.
A gap analysis in three parts
Missing required skills, missing preferred skills, and things you have but have buried.
Eight to twelve prioritised recommendations
Each with what to change, where in the CV, why it matters to the system or the recruiter, and the estimated point gain.
Rewritten content you can use immediately
A new professional summary, a regrouped skills section in the job description's exact language, and rewritten experience bullets in action, task and result form.
A projected score
What you'd score if you make every change honestly, and a clear statement of which gaps remain unclosable without new experience.
A formatting and parsing audit
An audit of the actual file, catching the things you can't see: hidden characters, broken dates, mixed fonts and layouts that confuse the parser.
Honest scoring you can defend in the interview.
A report that flatters you into a score you can't back up is worse than useless.
It will not invent experience
Every recommendation and every rewritten line stays within what your CV already supports, and anything that needs confirming from you is clearly marked rather than assumed.
It will not game the system
No keyword stuffing, no hidden white text. Recruiters see through that, and a report that flatters you into a score you can't defend in an interview is worse than useless.
It will not promise a number reality can't deliver
Real ATS behaviour varies by platform and by how each recruiter configures their search, and the report says so.
Anyone applying for a specific role who wants to stop guessing.
It is most valuable when the job matters, when you know you're qualified but keep hearing nothing back, or when your experience is described in a different vocabulary from the one the employer uses — a sector change, a move between company types, or a job title that doesn't match what you actually did.
Send your CV and the job description.
You receive the report as a PDF, typically ten to twelve pages, written for you rather than for a machine. Read the verdict first, then work through the recommendations in order; they are ranked by impact, so the first three usually move the score more than the rest combined.
Pair it with the Storybank Alignment Guide and the same job description becomes your interview preparation plan, because every responsibility the employer listed is a question they are likely to ask.
Remove the guesswork. Prepare with structure and focus.
Know exactly how your CV scores against the job before you apply, and exactly what to change.